Search this Site


email iconSign up for an email newsletter that lets you know when a new Post has been made. Will be sent at 8:00 a.m. any day with a new post. Unsubscribe at any time. Name optional.  Click here to subscribe.

Comments Policy

Comments that include personal attacks or slander or completely off topic will be deleted. Criticize the argument, not the person. Your real name is not required, but to distinguish between posters - a unique name is best. But do enter something.  If you don't, your comment will be deleted

Latest Comments

  • J Andrew Hall said More
    "A Heritage Christmas - Celebrating Canada 150" New website up at
    20 hours ago.
  • Newbie said More
    Cobourg is hot......Ontario is not. Thanks to our beach, pier, Marina , and parks! 1 week ago.
  • James Doherty said More
    Anyone know the theme this year. Would like to get started on a float. 2 weeks ago.
  • Dubious said More
    Langevin Bridge in Calgary is being renamed to "Reconciliation Bridge".... 2 weeks ago.
  • Frenchy said More
    “In a presentation to Council at their next Committee of the Whole Meeting on... 2 weeks ago.
  • Frenchy said More
    Dunno, are there young children and Moms with baby carriages on those sidewalks too? 2 weeks ago.
  • Lorry said More
    Does that apply to young children on their way to school along Burnham Street? 3 weeks ago.
  • ben said More
    Tell that to the stupd woman who nearly impaled herself as she rode into my... 3 weeks ago.

Login Form

Registering and logging in is recommended but not necessary for commenting

Login and edit your own posts.

Site Features

See this page for more about this site including its features.

Cobourg News Archive - the Cobourg News Blog has moved

New Posts for Cobourg News are now only on

Emails advising of new posts will direct you to the Cobourg News Blog - that's the new home of Cobourg News.  Posts prior to September 30, 2017 remain on Comments will only be viewed and possible here until October 31st, 2017.  News here (on Cobourg Internet) is now an archive.

Go to

The Association of  Municipalities Ontario (AMO) is concerned that there won’t be enough money to pay for necessary projects and have been working on a solution since Spring 2015.  Options to bring in more money included increasing fuel tax, starting a municipal income tax, a land transfer tax, increasing vehicle registration fees or taxing alcohol more.  But the final choice is to increase HST by 1%.  The funds raised (approx. $2.5B) would then be distributed based on a formula to all Ontario municipalities. Details of this proposal were presented to Northumberland County Council at their meeting on July 19, 2017.


local shareThe reason given for this move is “to help fund critical local services like roads, bridges and transit, to help reduce the upward pressure on property tax bills, and to diversify how we fund local communities.”  The project to look into this issue is called “Local Share”.


The proposal is the result of a review by AMO of finances for Ontario Municipalities and they determined that over the next 10 years, the total money required would be $13.2B/year.  If nothing is done, there would be a shortfall of $4.9B per year and given the current level of debt in the Province ($341B), it was thought unlikely that the Province would be able to help.  It was also thought that funding from a Sales Tax would be more predictable so would help long term planning.  To determine the best source of funding, criteria were established.  Funding should be:

  • Strategic and Forward-looking
  • Flexible  
  • Accountable
  • Transparent
  • Good public and fiscal policy
  • Fair and Equitable
  • Sustainable

There were 44 possible sources reviewed but a 1% increase in HST best met these criteria and would be 4 times the size of the current Federal gas tax revenue. 

The AMO commissioned a survey which found that Ontarians would approve an increase in HST of 1% if it all went to Municipalities.


One concern that councillors had was that if funding is increased this way, other grants from the Province might be reduced.  The intent is that this would be additional to other grants.  Currently, the Ontario average is that 27% of Municipal revenue comes from Federal and Provincial grants.

Local Impact

AMO LogoOf the net $2.5B, AMO estimates that Northumberland County would receive $6.3M per year and Cobourg $2.8M.  This would represent almost 9% of Cobourg’s current budget.  The AMO hopes that this proposal would “reduce upward pressure on property tax” – that is, taxes would not have to go up so much. I would suggest that it could even mean a reduction in property taxes!  That would be a first.


Update – August 17, 2017

Kathleen Wynne has flatly rejected the proposal from the Association of Municipalities of Ontario as described above.

The Hamilton Spectator reported:

"That's not something that I'll consider," Wynne told The Canadian Press in an interview before she was to address the AMO conference. "We're right now trying to help people get ahead ... People are having a hard time making ends meet, so this is not something that we would consider."

Wynne touted the government's previously announced plan to spend $190 billion on infrastructure over the next 13 years, noting that the federal government has also promised billions of dollars to address the province's aging systems.

The AMO did not acknowledge those plans in announcing its tax proposal, but said it expects municipalities across the province will struggle with infrastructure funding over the next decade.


Google Ad